Comments on: Netflix API with Mate http://unitedmindset.com/jonbcampos/2009/07/01/netflix-api-with-mate/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=netflix-api-with-mate Jonathan Campos's Blog about Flex and the Flash Platform Fri, 30 Jul 2010 09:47:28 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0 By: Jonathan Campos http://unitedmindset.com/jonbcampos/2009/07/01/netflix-api-with-mate/comment-page-1/#comment-179 Jonathan Campos Wed, 29 Jul 2009 14:10:24 +0000 http://unitedmindset.com/jonbcampos/?p=444#comment-179 Sadly you have to subclass and extend to fit the Mate array result/fault mxml handlers. Small nuisance but easily gotten over. Sadly you have to subclass and extend to fit the Mate array result/fault mxml handlers. Small nuisance but easily gotten over.

]]> By: Jon Toland http://unitedmindset.com/jonbcampos/2009/07/01/netflix-api-with-mate/comment-page-1/#comment-178 Jon Toland Tue, 28 Jul 2009 02:32:17 +0000 http://unitedmindset.com/jonbcampos/?p=444#comment-178 Having used Mate day in and out for six months or so now, my enfatuation is wearing off and I long to return to PureMVC and try out Fabrication. I'm uncertain though why you needed to subcalss anything. I've had to derive a few "inline" implementations of AsyncMethodInvoker for example, providing an "instance" property in lieu of their "generator" consept, but nothing domain specific? Enjoyable posts. Having used Mate day in and out for six months or so now, my enfatuation is wearing off and I long to return to PureMVC and try out Fabrication. I’m uncertain though why you needed to subcalss anything. I’ve had to derive a few “inline” implementations of AsyncMethodInvoker for example, providing an “instance” property in lieu of their “generator” consept, but nothing domain specific? Enjoyable posts.

]]> By: Jonathan campos http://unitedmindset.com/jonbcampos/2009/07/01/netflix-api-with-mate/comment-page-1/#comment-161 Jonathan campos Thu, 02 Jul 2009 23:13:07 +0000 http://unitedmindset.com/jonbcampos/?p=444#comment-161 100% magnus. Anything that isn't a straight httpservice or remoteobject service should probably be created as the example shows. 100% magnus. Anything that isn’t a straight httpservice or remoteobject service should probably be created as the example shows.

]]> By: Magnus http://unitedmindset.com/jonbcampos/2009/07/01/netflix-api-with-mate/comment-page-1/#comment-160 Magnus Thu, 02 Jul 2009 23:04:03 +0000 http://unitedmindset.com/jonbcampos/?p=444#comment-160 I'm not sure I completely get when you should create a custom class / an extension in Mate extending from AbstractServiceInvoker like for the loaders in this example vs when you would just use something like the AsyncMethodInvoker class in Mate. The Mate documentation is not completely clear. Is it fair to say that you should create a custom class that extends from the AbstractServiceInvoker anytime you need to have more control of the request/reply for your service and there isn't a class in Mate that already does the job and you may reuse it in other projects or are there other reasons? I’m not sure I completely get when you should create a custom class / an extension in Mate extending from AbstractServiceInvoker like for the loaders in this example vs when you would just use something like the AsyncMethodInvoker class in Mate. The Mate documentation is not completely clear.

Is it fair to say that you should create a custom class that extends from the AbstractServiceInvoker anytime you need to have more control of the request/reply for your service and there isn’t a class in Mate that already does the job and you may reuse it in other projects or are there other reasons?

]]>